Text by Tomasz Rusek, EAZA Brussels office
On 2 December 2025, EAZA proudly co-hosted a side event at the CITES CoP20 in Samarkand (Uzbekistan), dedicated to the protection of songbirds, again bringing our long-standing Silent Forest work to the global stage.

The event presented case studies from across the world on how international trade is impacting songbird populations, demonstrating that songbird trade issues is a global problem and showing why strengthened measures – within CITES and beyond – are urgently needed.
EAZA speakers Simon Bruslund (EAZA Silent Forest Group, Copenhagen Zoo – Denmark) and Jessica Lee (IUCN SSC Asian Songbird Trade Specialist Group, Mandai Nature – Singapore) shared powerful insights on the trade trends that threaten songbirds and define their conservation needs. They were joined by partners from other conservation NGOs, governments and academia, expressing support for the current proposal for CITES listing of several species of seed-finches in the genus Sporophila.

“Since the Silent Forest campaign, we have been able to maintain high support for songbirds. EAZA Members have since invested a stunning 2.1 million euros in songbird conservation. This shows the power of our campaigns – in bringing a group of threatened species into focus, and in getting partner organisations aligned for joint action. And while Silent Forest initially focused on Asia, it is clear that the songbird crisis is a global problem and requires global as well as local solutions, from Asia to Europe and Africa to the Americas.” – says Simon Bruslund.
As delegates arrived, they entered a unique bioacoustics show, “The Price of Beauty: Traded Soundscapes” developed by the Creative Conservation Lab. Voices of more than 70 songbird species filled CoP halls – a striking reminder of what is at stake if we fail to act.
Learn more about songbirds at CITES CoP20 here
The Price of Beauty: Traded Soundscapes – listen to songbirds online here

The side event was co-hosted by CoP20 observer organisations: European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA), Sustainable Innovation Initiatives, BirdLife International, TRAFFIC, WWF, Monitor Conservation Research Society, Center for Biological Diversity, IFAW, Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA), World Association of Zoos and Aquaria (WAZA), Wildlife Conservation Society, Mandai Nature
The event was financially sponsored by: EAZA Silent Forest Group, Copenhagen Zoo, EAZA, WAZA and Lincoln Park Zoo
CITES CoP20 ends on 5 December and the final vote on the listing proposal for the seed-finches is eagerly anticipated.
#CoP20 #CITES #CITESat50 #EAZA #Conservation #EEP #WildlifeTrade #SilentForest #songbirds #passerines


To create the aesthetic dataset for birds, over 6000 volunteers from 78 countries rated photographs of birds through the “
previously attributed to the 2005 EU import ban on wild birds. However, during 2005-2007 the global bird trade did a massive dip due to global bird-flu scare! Prior research analyses suggesting that the EU bird import ban was a conservation success did not account for Ghana’s 2007 removal of 114 bird species from CITES Appendix III, one of the largest deletion events in the history of CITES. In our study we analyzed trade data of CITES-listed species and non-CITES-listed species (including U.S. imports and global songbird trade data) to assess the effects of this deletion on reported trade patterns, examining changes in trade volumes as well as taxonomic and spatial shifts. Before their removal, deleted species comprised 70.7 % of global bird trade reported in the CITES Trade Database. After 2007, no deleted species were recorded in CITES data anymore. But our research have showed that the trade picked up again but was now “invisible” because authorities no longer documented the trade of the now un-listed birds in the CITES databases, while US imports of these species increased fourteenfold, new markets for African birds unfolded throughout Asia as well as illegally into the EU after 2006 peaking in volume between 2009 and 2014.















In the case of the White-rumped Shama nearly all range-states actively spoke out in support of the proposal, and none opposed this proposal. Particularly important was Indonesia who formulated their commitment for the conservation of this species which have the highest diversity of subspecies, in this country, with many of which are under serious pressure due to the trade.






Under the title Keeping the Music Alive the governments of Malaysia and Singapore held a wonderful side event aimed at explaining the rationale behind the two proposals, 8 and 9 on the
extinction it’s appendix I listing will allow more control, enable establishment of only sustainable captive breeding and trade to be legal and for illegal activities to be punished harder. It is also apparent that the White-rumped Shame is currently on the same path which have led the Straw-headed Bulbul to the edge of extinction a CITES appendix II listing in this species is only one conservation tool needed to keep this species away from a Red Listing and avoid further local extinctions. In conclusion; 















